Sexual harassment: A Theoretical Analysis
Summary of the Article
Castle’s Sexual Harassment Claims Surface in U.K. Parliament, highlights an event of sexual misconduct associated with different leaders including legislatures. From the beginning of the article, the author agrees with the fact that women frequently fall victims of unwelcomed advances at the work place. Besides, Castle posits that sexual harassment emanates across all institutions in the society including people in noble job positions (Castle n.d). The rampant reports of assault trigger heated debates and emotions that call for change. Despite the stringent laws associated with sexual harassment, more people still fall victims of the vice. In addition, Castle provides that the players in the entertainment industry use politics of harassment to fire successful people in the business.
Equally, the author worries that people in competitive jobs tend to fall victims of sexual harassment elements. For example, Crabb, a pension salary executive, apologized for portraying inappropriate behavior towards a 19-year old (Castle n.d). With the increasing trend of sexual harassment at the work place, Castle indicates that women law makers call for change in addressing the issue. The author grounds his perspective from the corridors of power. Ironically, legislators remain the main players in addressing issues concerning inappropriate behavior, but reports show that most of them propagate unacceptable sexual behavior.
From the article, Castle highlights the issue across all places of work. Therefore, this shows that the issue needs better solutions. Seemingly, the laws addressing unwelcomed sexual behavior fail to indicate the true meaning of its inappropriateness. Correspondingly, executives at the work place use their positions to harass lower level employees, especially women.
To explain the increasing rates of sexual harassment at the work place, Butler and Fraser provide interesting theories that enhance a better understanding of the social problem. Butler’s theory, Merely Cultural, borrows ideas from Marxist capitalist perspective. The theory provides that the capitalist perspective refrains from addressing real issues due to the oppression of the capitalist system (Butler 267). Butler argues that some of the problems at the work place happen due to a developed culture. According to the theory, Marxist opinion fails to address the impact of economic inequality. In addition, Butler argues that people in the society politicize issues instead of seeking solutions to the problem. As a result, the society fails to understand the gravity of the issue. In addition, Butler uses the orthodox of unity in her theory to explain that people’s culture impact the emergence of issues in the society. Correspondingly, the theory indicates that social movements develop due to lack of proper channels of addressing social vices. Butler argues that social movements in the contemporary society try to respond to issues related to sexuality.
In addition, Fraser’s clearly explains aspects of sexuality in her heterosexism, misrecognition, and capitalism. According to Fraser, identity politics show an increasing trend in the contemporary America (Fraser 279). She explains that social movements like feminism and anti-racial activists emanate due to an increase in social injustices in the society. Specifically, Fraser illustrates the struggles associated with the lesbian and gay communities. For this reason, Fraser’s theory bases its argument on culture and political economy. Like Butler, Fraser uses Marxists capitalisms to explain the use of power among the economic class to oppress others
What factors contribute to increasing trends in sexual harassment at the workplace?
Butler and Fraser’s theories help in understanding the case in Sexual Harassment Claims Surface in U.K. Parliament. From the article, it is crystal clear that the economic standards of the executive employees accord them with power. This power allows them to oppress the rest through sexual harassment.
Analysis of Evidence
From the article, one notes that leaders acts as the main players who support the increasing reports of sexual harassment at the work place. In fact, Caste indicates that prominent people steer a scaling trend in social problems related to sexuality. Due to shame and embarrassment associated with sexual assault, many lower level employees fail to report the cases. Another factor includes control of the factors of production, which allows people in top positions in organization to fire others for refusing their sexual advances. Resultantly, the problem upgrades to a culture that is normalized at the work place.
Sexual harassment shows an upward trend in the contemporary society. Despite of the laws governing this issue, the problem is far from over. Butler and Fraser borrow from the Marxist perspective to show the relationship between economic power and social problems. In relation with Castle’s article, the theories confirm that top-level employees sexually harass lower level employees. However, few victims report the incident, and this makes is hard to solve the problem amicably. For this reason, the theorists confirm that social movements develop due to unresolved social injustices in all institutions of the society. Other unique cases like harassment of lesbians show a conflict in accepting social change in the current society. Therefore, there is a dire need to establish better strategies that address the causes and implications of sexual harassment in all institutions of the society.